U.S. Secretly Supplies Ukraine with Long-Range Missiles Amid Escalating Conflict

War in Ukraine: for the first time kyiv uses longer-range US missiles against Russia

Ukraine Utilizes Advanced U.S. Missiles in Crimea

Ukraine has started employing longer-range ballistic missiles provided covertly by the United States, targeting Russian positions in occupied Crimea. These missiles, part of a broader U.S. support package, aim to bolster Ukraine's military capabilities without public announcement to preserve operational security.

Biden Approves $61 Billion Aid Package Including Military Support

Following the missile deployment, President Joe Biden has sanctioned a substantial $61 billion aid package, enhancing Ukraine's economic and military resources. This package, approved on Wednesday, also allocates funds to Taiwan and Israel, signaling a broad commitment to supporting allies.

Details on the Missile Systems Provided

The missiles in question are the extended-range versions of the Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS). Previously, the U.S. had supplied Ukraine with medium-range ATACMS but hesitated on providing longer-range versions due to concerns over escalating the conflict and depleting U.S. military readiness.

Kremlin Responds to New U.S. Military Aid

The Kremlin has dismissed the strategic impact of the ATACMS delivery, asserting that it will not alter the battlefield dynamics in Ukraine. Russian officials also accused the U.S. of direct involvement in the conflict by escalating the weapons supplied to Kyiv.

Immediate Deployment of U.S. Aid Following Congressional Approval

With the recent Congressional nod, President Biden announced the immediate dispatch of a new military aid package to Ukraine, including anti-aircraft systems, artillery, and armored vehicles. This move comes after a significant domestic political deadlock was resolved, allowing for the release of funds.

Zelensky Expresses Gratitude for U.S. Support

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has publicly thanked the U.S. for its continued support, emphasizing the critical nature of the aid in defending against Russian aggression. He highlighted the importance of long-range capabilities and air defense in restoring peace.

Concerns and Future Projections

Despite the immediate relief provided by the U.S. aid, there are ongoing concerns about the potential for these weapons to be used within Russian territory, which could further escalate the conflict. Meanwhile, the U.S. and its allies remain cautious but committed to supporting Ukraine's defense efforts.

In summary, the U.S. has taken significant steps to bolster Ukraine's defense against Russia by providing advanced missile systems and approving a substantial aid package, despite concerns about escalating the conflict.

References

  • https://www.clarin.com/mundo/guerra-ucrania-primera-vez-kiev-usa-rusia-misiles-estadounidenses-mayor-alcance_0_yIUko1jkdH.html
  • https://www.merkur.de/politik/krieg-gegen-die-ukraine-so-ist-die-lage-zr-93032363.html
  • https://www.merkur.de/politik/krieg-gegen-die-ukraine-so-ist-die-lage-zr-93029987.html
100tin

All news articles on 2024-04-25

You may like

Trends

2024-04-30T16:09:23.641Z
<h2>Tensions Escalate in the South China Sea: Philippine Coast Guard Confronts Chinese Vessels</h2> <h3>Incident Details</h3> <p>On April 29, the Philippine Coast Guard reported that one of its ships, the BRP Bagacay, was aggressively targeted with water cannons by Chinese Coast Guard ships near Scarborough Reef, a region claimed by both the Philippines and China. The confrontation also involved a Philippine Fisheries Authority ship being attacked similarly. The Filipino vessels were in the area to support local fishermen by distributing fuel and food.</p> <h3>Strategic Importance and Ongoing Disputes</h3> <p>Scarborough Reef, the location of the incident, is a critical point of contention between the two nations. Situated west of the Philippine main island of Luzon and approximately 800 kilometers from China's Hainan Island, the reef is within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone but has been occupied by China for several years. The area is not only a vital shipping lane but is also believed to contain substantial oil and gas reserves.</p> <h3>International and Regional Reactions</h3> <p>Following the incident, the Philippines accused China of harassment and constructing a temporary barrier on Scarborough Reef, which was later removed. This event adds to the series of disputes over the South China Sea, where China's expansive territorial claims have been rejected by an international arbitration tribunal, a ruling that Beijing has refused to recognize.</p> <h3>Potential for Broader Conflict</h3> <p>The confrontation raises concerns about possible involvement from the United States, given its mutual defense treaty with the Philippines. Recent statements from Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin highlight the conditions under which the U.S. would intervene militarily. Additionally, the ongoing military exercises and strategic partnerships in the region underscore the international stakes involved in these maritime disputes.</p> <h3>Chinese Position</h3> <p>In response to the incident, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Scarborough Shoal (referred to as Huangyan Island in China), warning the Philippines against further provocations.</p> <p>The situation remains fraught with the potential for escalating into a significant geopolitical conflict, involving not just the regional players but possibly leading to a direct confrontation between nuclear powers, the USA and China.</p>

Latest

* <h2>Tensions Escalate in the South China Sea: Philippine Coast Guard Confronts Chinese Vessels</h2> <h3>Incident Details</h3> <p>On April 29, the Philippine Coast Guard reported that one of its ships, the BRP Bagacay, was aggressively targeted with water cannons by Chinese Coast Guard ships near Scarborough Reef, a region claimed by both the Philippines and China. The confrontation also involved a Philippine Fisheries Authority ship being attacked similarly. The Filipino vessels were in the area to support local fishermen by distributing fuel and food.</p> <h3>Strategic Importance and Ongoing Disputes</h3> <p>Scarborough Reef, the location of the incident, is a critical point of contention between the two nations. Situated west of the Philippine main island of Luzon and approximately 800 kilometers from China's Hainan Island, the reef is within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone but has been occupied by China for several years. The area is not only a vital shipping lane but is also believed to contain substantial oil and gas reserves.</p> <h3>International and Regional Reactions</h3> <p>Following the incident, the Philippines accused China of harassment and constructing a temporary barrier on Scarborough Reef, which was later removed. This event adds to the series of disputes over the South China Sea, where China's expansive territorial claims have been rejected by an international arbitration tribunal, a ruling that Beijing has refused to recognize.</p> <h3>Potential for Broader Conflict</h3> <p>The confrontation raises concerns about possible involvement from the United States, given its mutual defense treaty with the Philippines. Recent statements from Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin highlight the conditions under which the U.S. would intervene militarily. Additionally, the ongoing military exercises and strategic partnerships in the region underscore the international stakes involved in these maritime disputes.</p> <h3>Chinese Position</h3> <p>In response to the incident, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Scarborough Shoal (referred to as Huangyan Island in China), warning the Philippines against further provocations.</p> <p>The situation remains fraught with the potential for escalating into a significant geopolitical conflict, involving not just the regional players but possibly leading to a direct confrontation between nuclear powers, the USA and China.</p>
2024-04-30T16:09:23.641Z

* <h2>Trump Criticizes Netanyahu in Recent Interviews</h2> <h3>Harsh Words for Netanyahu</h3> <p>Former US President Donald Trump expressed strong criticism towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a recent interview with "Time" magazine, conducted on April 12 in Florida. Trump blamed Netanyahu for the events of October 7, stating, "This attack should not have happened," and suggested that Netanyahu had the means to prevent it but failed to do so.</p> <h3>Strained Relations After 2020 Election</h3> <p>The relationship between Trump and Netanyahu, once marked by close cooperation, notably deteriorated after Netanyahu congratulated Joe Biden on his 2020 presidential election win. Trump, who disputes the legitimacy of Biden's victory, felt betrayed by Netanyahu's lack of loyalty.</p> <h3>Disappointment Over Soleimani Operation</h3> <p>In the same interview, Trump recounted a negative experience with Netanyahu concerning a planned operation to eliminate Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, which Israel withdrew from at the last minute. This incident left Trump feeling let down and questioning his trust in Netanyahu.</p> <h3>Uncertain Support for Netanyahu's Leadership</h3> <p>When asked about the future leadership of Israel, Trump hesitated to endorse Netanyahu's continuation as Prime Minister and mentioned other potential leaders, including Benny Gantz, whom he views favorably.</p> <h3>Military Aid and Palestinian Statehood</h3> <p>In a separate report by Time magazine, Trump did not dismiss the possibility of withholding military aid to Israel to pressure an end to the Gaza conflict. He also shared his current views on a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, labeling it as "very problematic" and unlikely to be a feasible solution at this time.</p> <h3>Continued Support in Confrontation with Iran</h3> <p>Despite his criticisms, Trump affirmed that the U.S. would support Israel in any conflict with Iran, emphasizing the conditional nature of his support based on specific circumstances.</p> <h3>Conclusion on Trump-Netanyahu Relationship</h3> <p>The once strong partnership between Trump and Netanyahu, which facilitated significant diplomatic achievements such as the Abraham Accords, has faced significant challenges post-2020 election, reflecting a complex and evolving dynamic between the two leaders.</p>
2024-04-30T12:19:20.492Z

NewsBlog ©100tin Team - Privacy